Crap in a theater: boycott this movie
Anyway, there's something else, though, that I need right now that I can't seem to find...
Looks in basket of dirty laundry...
Checks behind the box spring...
Opens the cedar chest...
Aha! My soapbox! I knew I packed you where I’d be able to find you! Now that I am standing firmly upon you, I have got to get something off my chest...something that has been irking me for the last few months.
It seems that this summer New Line Cinema is releasing a little film called Snakes on a Plane, starring Samuel L. Jackson and 30% of the cast of Final Destination 3. I've been following this Snakes debacle since last summer and the more I read about it, the more irritated I get -- and not just because Samuel L. Jackson is systematically dismantling his once cooler-than-cool persona. This movie is not just smearing Jackson, but snakes, too.

Despite my tetchy relationship with the Nature Center and all things Nature Centery, I will always have a soft spot in my heart for snakes. It wasn’t until I worked with those lovable reptiles every day that I realized that they do all have their own personalities – they’re not just mouths with a tail. There was an indigo snake there that was quite the ham and did silly things in front of school groups, like perch his head on my index finger and check out the crowd. We had a snowcorn that always found her way into the belt loops on my pants, making herself into a lovely living snake belt; she sometimes made herself at home in my ponytail, which was a little awkward, but entertaining nonetheless. Not all of the snakes were fun and games, of course; our king snakes were grumpy old men who pooped on you whenever you picked them up…just like grumpy old human men.
No matter the personality, though, as a naturalist, I tried to impart the same snake lesson to all of our visitors: snakes are good. Snakes eat rodents. Not cats or dogs or slow-moving children (usually). Snakes are essential for controlling the mouse and rat population: if you started with two mice, a male and female, and they bred, and those offspring bred, and then those offspring bred, at the end of the year without any predation, you would have 15,000 mice. Mice can reproduce at three weeks of age and have litters of up to 22. Dude, that’s a lot of mouse shit – and that’s far more dangerous for humans than a five-foot long animal without arms or legs or ears.
I can’t say that I changed everyone’s views on snakes. I was a lot of things in my tenure at the Nature Center – Xerox repairperson, outcast, toad urination station – but miracle worker was not one of the hats I wore. I've accepted that the majority of people just don't trust animals without legs...which is weird because people don't like spiders either and they have a ton of legs. I know there's some biblical stuff involved, leading to the serpent's bad rap. I've given enough awkward snake presentations to uber-Christian groups to know that's true; I especially liked when teachers would ask me to point out to the class where the snakes’ hips are, from when the snakes had legs before they were damned or whatever. I don’t know my Bible stuff. (Oh, which reminds me: Happy Easter).
Christianity can’t take all the blame for the snake’s bad public image, though; Hollywood has done as much, if not more, to convince the general public of the inherent evil snakes possess.
Fun fact: in south Florida, there are 42 native species of snakes, only four of which are venomous. The largest species is the indigo snake, growing up to nine feet long (in fact, it’s the largest native North American snake), but they’re highly endangered, so no one sees them anyway (but if you did, you would be interested to know that this gentle snake actually eats venomous snakes like rattlesnakes, which makes the indigo a pretty cool snake to have hanging around). The next largest snake is probably the yellow rat snake, a skinny snake that gets to be about six feet long and dines exclusively on rats and mice. That’s it. There are no native anaconda-size snakes lurking in your bushes, attacking the pizza boy when he’s trying to deliver your dinner.
The majority of people, though, sees a snake in their yard, and assumes that it’s going to grow to be 20-feet-long and eat their German shepherd. Why do they think this? Methinks they’ve seen one too many movies where the antagonist is a menacing snakey behemoth. Lake Placid or Anaconda, anyone?
Here’s where I take issue with the brilliantly-named Snakes on a Plane. The premise is that a terrorist is taking over a plane by releasing highly venomous snakes in the passenger-filled cabin. From all the movie stills I’ve seen, the snakes appear to be milk snakes or scarlet kingsnakes which are no more venomous or dangerous than my bunny rabbit. In fact, Hef the bunny could totally take those snakes in a fight.
So, immediately, the movie is factually incorrect (and stupidly named). But what really gets me is the idea that free-roaming little snakes = mass hysteria. Why make people more scared of something than they already are – and needlessly so? Most snakes won’t bite without provocation – so don’t piss them off. It’s just that easy. (By the way, the same goes for me; I seldom nip at others unless they really rub me the wrong way).
I beseech thee, gentle reader, not to watch this movie. If flight attendants can boycott that Jodie Foster airplane movie because it made flight attendants look like stone cold bitches, then we can boycott Snakes on a Plane. And we will.
The snakes will thank you.


